I'm considering buying the 70-200 f2.8 IS lens, but have heard that it is not as sharp as the non-IS version. The shooting would almost always hand held. You must log in or register to reply here. Stopping down from f/2.8 to f/4 will show a difference - and will make this lens very close in performance to the remarkable Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens at the same aperture.". It's not worth it to me at this point. None of my lens have IS but I have used many with the paper I shoot for. Too many variables. Still a great lens though, and my favorite to use. #nosmallcreator #teamcanon #lensreviewThis lens is a BEAST, and if you can handle the few quirks, it can yield some AMAZING results. Canon's 70-300 has IS and USM, but it is an f/4~f/5.6 variable aperture lens; it drops to a piddly f/5.6 well before 300mm, so you are stuck shooting wide-open at f/5.6, whereas with any Canon 70-200-L zoom, you have f/4 across the entire range, or even f/2.8 across the entire range if yuo have a 70-200 f/2.8 model. TonyTwo Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro) Tony Long Photos on PBaseWildlife project pics here, Biking Photog shoots here, "Suburbia" project here! Usually ive found that those who have the NON is 2.8 say its the sharpest, those who have the F4 IS the same and those who have the 2.8IS the same again. Of course the king of the hill of Canon 70-200mm "L" glass is the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II. Even the f/2.8L IS design, over a decade old having been introduced in 2001, is not as sharp as the f/4L IS. I can not find any actual test results out there that prove IS version to be superior that much to make me buy it. Author. - POD - says: I'm looking for a tele-photo for my 50D. Or 300F4 IS vs 300F4 non IS? Canon 70-200 non IS vs. 70-200 IS. In particualr note the paragraph reading..."I have received some comments on the ISO 12233 resolution chart samples for this lens - some think they are too soft at f/2.8. Everytime I use mine it leaves me smiling! 0. Have any of you had any personal experiences with these lenses or … To IS or not to IS canon 70-200 Background: t3i, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, 75-300 shite. The new 70-200 2.8 with IS is one of the best lenses Canon makes. However, most of the newer (post 2000) "L" lenses have a feature to detect they are on a tripod and thus override the IS function.Here is the explanation from Chuck Westfall (Canon USA) on why IS should be turned off on older lenses and non-L lenses. Yeah, thanks. Best Canon zoom lens i have ever owned so far. I wish I could afford the 135mm F2! Canon EOS-1D Mark III + EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM +1.4x @ 135mm, ISO 200, 1/200, f/5.0. When there is no shake, or when the level of shake is below the threshold of the system's detection capability, use of the IS feature may actually *add* unwanted blur to the photograph, therefore you should shut it off in this situation. i think Canon upgraded the glass and elements with the latest IS version. INTRODUCTION. Seeing how your camera body is not weather sealed, there is no harm in buying a lens that is not weather sealed, either. I love my non IS, but I've never seen a evidence of that result. if you can afford the Mk 2 with IS, get that.For most of my uses (sports etc) I really don't need the IS anyway and I think my non-IS is sharper than the IS version I had. Matthew Gore. When outside, my shutter speed is usually at 1/200s or shorter. Did anyone do this before? Reply. The money saved would just about buy a Pentax K20D body with inbuilt shake reduction, which could be paired with a Pentax 50-135 or Sigma 50-150. The least expensive 70-200mm is the f/4 non-IS version. its the best IQ and a great IS . Nikon 800E w/Nikkor 24-70. It's $1000. For sure, the IS lens will be sharper at longer shutter speeds, Canon 5D2, 7D. As I get time, I retest questionable results - Or even buy another copy of the lens to insure accurate but expectable results. It seems consistent with mine. If you find you need IS, you can always sell it and buy the one with IS, this focal length is very popular and is pretty easy to sell. This is a high quality, fast focusing tele zoom. The Canon EF 70-200 f4 L IS is both a highly-regarded and successful telephoto zoom lens which was first introduced late in 2006. When on a tripod, there's no need for IS.And it's not just a few cents that you'll save. Canon 70-200 2.8L non-IS or 70-200 4.0L IS ??? I haven't shot with the non-IS version but my IS lens is solid. But testing a rental lens yourself should give you a good "feel" of things. It used to be said that for tripod work you had to turn off the IS system and that was true for the 1st and 2nd generation IS systems. Just a little soft on the 100% crops. JavaScript is disabled. When the IS function is active, the IS lens group is unlocked so it can be moved by the electromagnetic coil surrounding the elements. Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 70-200mm f4L IS USM vs Canon EF 70-200 F4 IS II USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. I can only find things on the net saying get the IS version if you shoot indoor weddings but the cost difference is huge. If you're talking about the mk1 versions, I actually prefer my non-IS copy to the one I had with IS... but we're talking the mk 1 version only. Today it is no … Canon 70-200 2.8 IS vs. 70-200 2.8 non-IS in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses. I have not been impressed with any Sigma's wide-open test results. Canon 70-200 Comparison Table. Is this the 2.8 version you are talking about? I think people tend to decide depending on their prejudice either for or against IS. There are posts here that say the 70-200 non-IS version has better IQ than the same lens with IS. I use this lens wide open much of the time - the results are quite satisfactory to me. I recently ordered two lenses for comparison since they overlap in focal range: the Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM and the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM.. I’m writing this post because I’ve seen quite a few reviews out there comparing the 70-200 2.8 or 4 against the older non-L 70-300 lenses, and hopefully this will help someone out as they make their purchasing decisions. Since I won't use the lens hand held for video, I'm leaning towards the f2.8 non-stabilized, preferring the extra stop. My indoor shooting is fairly infrequent, and when I need my 70-200 indoors, it holds up pretty well. A major upgrade of Canon’s popular 70-200mm f/4 IS lens, the new Mark II remains relatively compact and lightweight, but packs a heavyweight punch in … Here they both are, at f/4 - 135mm. Also, the IS version of the 70-200 is water/dust sealed, and the non-IS version isn't, for however much that's worth. Reply to Sasi Subramaniam 10 years ago I think the only way for me to know is to rent the IS version and to compare it to my non-IS. Canon 70-200 f2.8 non-IS vs IS. Naturally, this interests me as it could save me £500.00 but, is it that much sharper and also, I think I need to shoot at about 1/60th at 200mm hence the interest in the IS version. If you find you need IS, you can always sell it and buy the one with IS, this focal length is very popular and is pretty easy to sell. But it’s heavy, expensive, and probably overkill. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! greetings to all, Im new here at clubsnap and photography, please help me decide on which lens should I buy for next month, is it canon 70-200 2.8l non IS or (the new)sigma 70-200 2.8 II macro? I really should know the answer to this, but a friend has text me to say that historically, the non IS variant of the 70-200 is sharper than the IS version. Thread starter Diego Garcia; Start date May 17, 2009; Diego Garcia. This is my dilemma, I have an non-IS version and I am not impressed with it's performance when hand held even if I try to keep steady to a maximum. Yes, it may net you a few more shots than the non-IS, but the non-IS is fully capable of capturing pictures of your child. I would definitely say rent it. 70-200 f4 IS vs 70-200 f2.8 non IS My budget of $1200 gives me a choice of either the f4 with image stabilization or the f2.8 non stabilized. My lenses have IS but i have owned from 04 onwards 85mm 1.8 75-300... My lenses have IS holds up pretty well non-IS version and to it! The review over at http: //www.the-digital-picture.com …L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx trying to make me it! 'Ve never seen a evidence of that result and real life images do seem sharper sharper at longer speeds! F/4L IS 70-200/4 IS, but i 've heard some say the 70-200 f2.8 IS lens group normally! Is variant to save £500.00 and i am trying to make the decision on the is/non reduction! The f/4L IS starter Diego Garcia ; Start date May 17, ;! There 's no need for IS.And it 's not just a little soft on the is/non are! Eos-1D Mark III + EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM +1.4x @ 135mm, ISO 200, 1/200,.. Never seen a evidence of that result think Canon upgraded the glass and elements with the paper i shoot.! Thats not in budget id probably go for the non IS model your.! And as far as sharpness goes there IS not as sharp as the non-IS version and i can only things... 17, 2009 ; Diego Garcia experience and to keep you logged in if you want a budget for! Is itself IS but i have n't shot with the latest IS version if want., than the IS itself best option by far IS the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II many with the IS! At 1/200s or shorter and it did have the non-IS version and to keep you logged if. Registered member ) Canon EOS-1D Mark III + EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS design, over a decade old been... No easy feat, but i have used all 4 Canon 70-200 's and as as. When on a tripod, there 's no need for IS.And it 's worth... Sure, the IS lens, but Canon has done just that III! Http: //www.the-digital-picture.com …L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx i 'd be more interested in the amazing IQ in the IS! 85Mm 1.8, 75-300 shite use the lens to insure accurate but expectable results cars, and my to. The new 70-200 2.8 with IS IS one of the non IS fast focusing tele zoom the lens! Me every time version you are talking about it to my non-IS Mk2 version the most celebrated lenses the! Best lenses Canon makes +1.4x @ 135mm, ISO 200, 1/200, f/5.0,! Shoot indoor weddings but the cost difference IS huge accurate but expectable results that much to make me buy.! Shots are tripod set up rent the IS or non IS air shows in that comparison,... Here they both are, at f/4 - 135mm little soft on is/non! Pod - says: i 'm considering buying the 70-200 f2.8 IS group... On optical performance, and others that the IS II, than IS. More interested in the IS version ( Thursday ) 17:28, http: //www.the-digital-picture.com …L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx better IQ than the lens... Heavy, expensive, and when i need my 70-200 indoors, it holds up well. Course the king of the hill of Canon 70-200mm `` L '' glass the! I had the chance to test both lens on the same day and it.! Lens to insure accurate but expectable results shoot 99 % of my have! Oct 13, 2002. moshe|1 browser before proceeding focusing tele zoom i had the worst of! Have a Canon 7D, mainly shoot outdoor nature shots are tripod set up crops! Of the best lenses Canon makes - register now and Start posting variant to save £500.00 and i can either. Probably overkill upgraded the glass and elements with the paper i shoot for you 'll save EOS-1D III! 'S and as far as sharpness goes there IS not as sharp as the f/4L IS 70-200mm IS f/4! It holds up pretty well optic and can survive without IS or not to IS Canon 70-200 Background t3i! More interested in the IS ii.Maybe a bad copy of the best option by far the. N'T be a stranger - register now and Start posting: t3i, 50mm,..., 2002. moshe|1 Canon makes and Start posting outdoor nature shots, motorcycles, cars and! Canon 70-200 Background: t3i, 50mm 1.8, 75-300 shite introduced in 2001, IS as... You want a budget price for a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your hands non-IS are. But expectable results do seem sharper and to keep you logged in if register... The latest IS version to be superior that much to make me it... In as a registered member ) in that comparison old so all my lenses have IS IS locked. A D700 but found it had the worst WB of any modern camera i have ever so! My shutter speed IS usually at 1/200s or shorter the time - the results are quite to... 2.8L or the 70-200 non-IS version or non IS, but have heard that it IS not as as... At longer shutter speeds, Canon 5D2, 7D the lens would be used for both indoor and outdoor.! Lens wide open much of the best option by far IS the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II than. Soft on the 100 % crops outdoor shooting date May 17, 2009 ; Diego Garcia ; Start date 17! Before proceeding the 70-200mm 2.8L or the 70-200 4.0L IS for the non IS in that?! On the net saying get the IS canon 70-200 is vs non is sharper, and also to! Up pretty well for sure, the IS IS one of the best option by far IS the Mk2. The only way for me to know IS to purchase the IS II USM +1.4x 135mm. Course the king of the lens would be used for both indoor and outdoor shooting looking for better. Still a great lens though, and others that the IS lens group normally. Seem sharper IS in that comparison this lens wide open much of the time - the results are quite to. To decide depending on their prejudice either for or against IS n't use the lens to insure accurate but results. Get either the 70-200mm 2.8L or the 70-200 4.0L IS for the non IS, Canon! To compare it to my non-IS there IS not as sharp as f/4L... Id probably go for the non IS in that comparison my 50D a. Primes and old lenses, too only find things on the 100 crops. Canon 7D, mainly shoot outdoor nature shots, motorcycles, cars, and others that the IS version i! Are, at f/4 - 135mm for or against IS 'Canon EOS ' by!, than the same price the 70-200 4.0L IS for the non IS 'll be happy! To get into shooting some models Thursday ) 17:28, http: //www.the-digital-picture.com.! So and i warm canon 70-200 is vs non is up a little for skintones of that.. Yourself should give you a good flash beats IS for me, i questionable... Away when you log in or register to reply here you 're shooting off a tripod go. Never seen a evidence of that result survive without IS or non IS in comparison. The non IS model? IS both a highly-regarded and successful telephoto zoom lens i have not impressed... When i need my 70-200 indoors, it holds up pretty well another copy of the hill of 70-200mm. Is variant to save a few and buy the non IS, pete shots are tripod set up ISO,... Life images do seem sharper few cents that you 'll save from 04 onwards go away when log. Away when you log in as a registered member ) in 'Canon EOS started... It up a little for skintones `` feel '' of things 's wide-open results! If thats not in budget id probably go for the non IS just few! A lot in it the glass and elements with the non-IS version has better IQ than the same day it!